Interested in a PLAGIARISM-FREE paper based on these particular instructions?...with 100% confidentiality?

Order Now

This week you will submit your instructional unit, which should include three lesson plans: one focused on patient education, one on family education, and one on staff development. Remember, your plans should demonstrate a logical approach to teaching, communicate what is to be taught and how, and outline how objectives are to be evaluated. Click here for a refresher on what each final lesson should include. Building on the work that you started in Week 2, for all three groups of learners: Write several broad instructional goals for the educational experience. Write several behavioral objectives based on Bloom’s taxonomy. Describe the lesson content. Provide a sequence for teaching activities. Describe instructional methods. Indicate time allotted for each activity. Identify and describe the instructional resources (materials, tools, etc.) and technology to be used. Describe how the learning will be evaluated. On a separate references page, cite all sources using APA format. Use this APA Citation Helper as a convenient reference for properly citing resources. This handout will provide you the details of formatting your essay using APA style. You may create your essay in this APA-formatted template. Unsatisfactory 1 Emerging 2 Proficient 3 Exemplary 4 Score Assignment Components Listed two broad instructional goals for the educational experience for each of the three groups of learners. Did not include instructional goals for the educational experience and/or did not include all learners. Minimally listed broad instructional goals for the educational experience and included two of the three groups of learners. Listed several broad instructional goals for the educational experience and included all learners. Goals could be more clearly stated. Expertly stated several broad instructional goals for the educational experience and included all learners. [Score x 4 = 16 pts] Listed learning objectives that addressed the cognitive capabilities of each of the three groups of learners. Did not include learning objectives that addressed the cognitive capabilities of the learner and/or did not include all groups of learners. Minimally listed learning objectives that addressed the cognitive capabilities of the learner and included two of the three groups of learners Listed learning objectives that addressed the cognitive capabilities of the learner and included all learners. Objectives could be more clearly stated. Expertly stated learning objectives that addressed the cognitive capabilities of the learner and included all learners. [Score x 4 = 16 pts] Listed learning objectives that addressed the affective capabilities for each of the three groups of learners. Did not include learning objectives that addressed the affective capabilities of the learner and/or did not include all learners. Minimally listed learning objectives that addressed the affective capabilities of the learner and included two of the three groups of learners. Listed learning objectives that addressed the affective capabilities of the learner and included all learners identified. Objectives could be more clearly stated. Expertly stated learning objectives that addressed the affective capabilities of the learner and included all three groups of learners. [Score x 4 = 16 pts] Listed learning objectives that addressed the psychomotor capabilities of each of the three groups of learners. Did not include learning objectives that addressed the psychomotor capabilities of the learner and/or did not include all learners. Minimally listed learning objectives that addressed the psychomotor capabilities of the learner and included two of the three groups of learners. Listed learning objectives that addressed the psychomotor capabilities of the learner and included all learners. Objectives could be more clearly stated. Expertly stated learning objectives that addressed the psychomotor capabilities of the learner and included all learners identified. [Score x 4 = 16 pts] Provided an appropriate description of the lesson content Provided a description of the lesson content but was not clearly focused or coherent. Minimally Provided an appropriate description of the lesson content. Provided an appropriate description of the lesson content, but could be more detailed. Provided a description of the lesson content that was appropriate, thorough, and detailed. [Score x 4 = 16 pts] Provided a sequence for teaching activities and time allotted for each activity. Provided a sequence for teaching activities and time allotted for each activity but was not clearly focused or coherent. Minimally provided a sequence for teaching activities and time allotted for each activity Provided an appropriate sequence for teaching activities and time allotted for each activity, but could be more detailed. Provided a thoroughly detailed sequence for teaching activities and time allotted for each activity. [Score x 4 = 16 pts] Described the instructional strategies Description of the instructional strategies was not clearly focused or coherent. Provided a minimal description of the instructional strategies. Provided an acceptable description of the instructional strategies, but could be more detailed. Thoroughly described the instructional strategies in detail. [Score x 4 = 16 pts] Identified and described the instructional resources and technology Identified and described the instructional resources and technology but was not focused or coherent.. Minimally identified and described the instructional resources and technology Identified and described the instructional resources and technology but could be more detailed. Identified and thoroughly described the instructional resources and technology in detail. [Score x 4 = 16 pts] Provided an evaluation methodology Provided an evaluation methodology but was not clearly focused or coherent. Provided an evaluation methodology with minimal information. Provided an acceptable evaluation methodology but could be more detailed. Thoroughly provided an evaluation methodology in detail. [Score x 4 = 16 pts] Writing Components Organization Introduction Thesis Transitions Conclusion Introduction is limited or missing entirely. The paper lacks a thesis statement. Transitions are infrequent, illogical, or missing entirely. Conclusion is limited or missing entirely. Introduction is present but incomplete or underdeveloped. The paper is loosely organized around a thesis that may have to be inferred. Transitions are sporadic. Conclusion is present, but incomplete or underdeveloped. Introduction has a clear opening, provides background information, and states the topic. The paper is organized around an arguable, clearly stated thesis statement. Transitions are appropriate and help the flow of ideas. Conclusion summarizes main argument and has a clear ending. Introduction catches the reader’s attention, provides compelling and appropriate background info, and clearly states the topic. The paper is well organized around an arguable, focused thesis. Thoughtful transitions clearly show how ideas relate. Conclusion leaves the reader with a sense of closure and provides concluding insights. [Score x 3 = 12 pts] Usage and Mechanics Grammar Spelling Sentence structure Writing contains numerous errors in spelling, grammar, and/or sentence structure that severely interferes with readability and comprehension. Errors in spelling and grammar exist that somewhat interfere with readability and/or comprehension. Writing follows conventions of spelling and grammar throughout. Errors are infrequent and do not interfere with readability or comprehension. The paper is basically error free in terms of mechanics. Grammar and mechanics help establish a clear idea and aid the reader in following the writer’s logic. [Score x 3 = 12 pts] APA Elements Attribution Paraphrasing Quotations No attempt at APA format. APA format is attempted to paraphrase, quote, and cite, but errors are significant. Using APA format, accurately paraphrased, quoted, and cited in many spots throughout when appropriate or called for. Errors present are somewhat minor. Using APA format, accurately paraphrased, quoted, and cited throughout the presentation when appropriate or called for. Only a few minor errors present. [Score x3 = 12 pts] Subtotal Timeliness Late Work penalty: Total Score / 180

This week you will submit your instructional unit, which should include three lesson plans: one focused on patient education, one on family education, and one on staff development. Remember, your plans should demonstrate a logical approach to teaching, communicate what is to be taught and how, and outline how objectives are to be evaluated. Click here for a refresher on what each final lesson should include.

Building on the work that you started in Week 2, for all three groups of learners:

  • Write several broad instructional goals for the educational experience.
  • Write several behavioral objectives based on Bloom’s taxonomy.
  • Describe the lesson content.
  • Provide a sequence for teaching activities.
  • Describe instructional methods.
  • Indicate time allotted for each activity.
  • Identify and describe the instructional resources (materials, tools, etc.) and technology to be used.
  • Describe how the learning will be evaluated.

On a separate references page, cite all sources using APA format.

Unsatisfactory

1

Emerging

2

Proficient

3

Exemplary

4

Score
Assignment Components
Listed two broad instructional goals for the educational experience for each of the three groups of learners. Did not include instructional goals for the educational experience and/or did not include all learners. Minimally listed broad instructional goals for the educational experience and included two of the three groups of learners. Listed several broad instructional goals for the educational experience and included all learners. Goals could be more clearly stated. Expertly stated several broad instructional goals for the educational experience and included all learners. [Score x 4 = 16 pts]
Listed learning objectives that addressed the cognitive capabilities of each of the three groups of learners. Did not include learning objectives that addressed the cognitive capabilities of the learner and/or did not include all groups of learners. Minimally listed learning objectives that addressed the cognitive capabilities of the learner and included two of the three groups of learners Listed learning objectives that addressed the cognitive capabilities of the learner and included all learners. Objectives could be more clearly stated. Expertly stated learning objectives that addressed the cognitive capabilities of the learner and included all learners. [Score x 4 = 16 pts]
Listed learning objectives that addressed the affective capabilities for each of the three groups of learners. Did not include learning objectives that addressed the affective capabilities of the learner and/or did not include all learners. Minimally listed learning objectives that addressed the affective capabilities of the learner and included two of the three groups of learners. Listed learning objectives that addressed the affective capabilities of the learner and included all learners identified. Objectives could be more clearly stated. Expertly stated learning objectives that addressed the affective capabilities of the learner and included all three groups of learners. [Score x 4 = 16 pts]
Listed learning objectives that addressed the psychomotor capabilities of each of the three groups of learners. Did not include learning objectives that addressed the psychomotor capabilities of the learner and/or did not include all learners. Minimally listed learning objectives that addressed the psychomotor capabilities of the learner and included two of the three groups of learners. Listed learning objectives that addressed the psychomotor capabilities of the learner and included all learners. Objectives could be more clearly stated. Expertly stated learning objectives that addressed the psychomotor capabilities of the learner and included all learners identified. [Score x 4 = 16 pts]
Provided an appropriate description of the lesson content Provided a description of the lesson content but was not clearly focused or coherent. Minimally Provided an appropriate description of the lesson content. Provided an appropriate description of the lesson content, but could be more detailed. Provided a description of the lesson content that was appropriate, thorough, and detailed. [Score x 4 = 16 pts]
Provided a sequence for teaching activities and time allotted for each activity. Provided a sequence for teaching activities and time allotted for each activity but was not clearly focused or coherent. Minimally provided a sequence for teaching activities and time allotted for each activity Provided an appropriate sequence for teaching activities and time allotted for each activity, but could be more detailed. Provided a thoroughly detailed sequence for teaching activities and time allotted for each activity. [Score x 4 = 16 pts]
Described the instructional strategies Description of the instructional strategies was not clearly focused or coherent. Provided a minimal description of the instructional strategies. Provided an acceptable description of the instructional strategies, but could be more detailed. Thoroughly described the instructional strategies in detail. [Score x 4 = 16 pts]
Identified and described the instructional resources and technology Identified and described the instructional resources and technology but was not focused or coherent.. Minimally identified and described the instructional resources and technology Identified and described the instructional resources and technology but could be more detailed. Identified and thoroughly described the instructional resources and technology in detail. [Score x 4 = 16 pts]
Provided an evaluation methodology Provided an evaluation methodology but was not clearly focused or coherent. Provided an evaluation methodology with minimal information. Provided an acceptable evaluation methodology but could be more detailed. Thoroughly provided an evaluation methodology in detail. [Score x 4 = 16 pts]
Writing Components
Organization

Introduction

Thesis

Transitions

Conclusion

Introduction is limited or missing entirely.

The paper lacks a thesis statement.

Transitions are infrequent, illogical, or missing entirely.

Conclusion is limited or missing entirely.

Introduction is present but incomplete or underdeveloped.

The paper is loosely organized around a thesis that may have to be inferred.

Transitions are sporadic.

Conclusion is present, but incomplete or underdeveloped.

Introduction has a clear opening, provides background information, and states the topic.

The paper is organized around an arguable, clearly stated thesis statement.

Transitions are appropriate and help the flow of ideas.

Conclusion summarizes main argument and has a clear ending.

Introduction catches the reader’s attention, provides compelling and appropriate background info, and clearly states the topic.

The paper is well organized around an arguable, focused thesis.

Thoughtful transitions clearly show how ideas relate.

Conclusion leaves the reader with a sense of closure and provides concluding insights.

[Score x 3 = 12 pts]
Usage and Mechanics

Grammar

Spelling

Sentence structure

Writing contains numerous errors in spelling, grammar, and/or sentence structure that severely interferes with readability and comprehension. Errors in spelling and grammar exist that somewhat interfere with readability and/or comprehension. Writing follows conventions of spelling and grammar throughout. Errors are infrequent and do not interfere with readability or comprehension. The paper is basically error free in terms of mechanics. Grammar and mechanics help establish a clear idea and aid the reader in following the writer’s logic. [Score x 3 = 12 pts]
APA Elements

Attribution

Paraphrasing

Quotations

No attempt at APA format. APA format is attempted to paraphrase, quote, and cite, but errors are significant. Using APA format, accurately paraphrased, quoted, and cited in many spots throughout when appropriate or called for. Errors present are somewhat minor. Using APA format, accurately paraphrased, quoted, and cited throughout the presentation when appropriate or called for. Only a few minor errors present. [Score x3 = 12 pts]
Subtotal
Timeliness Late Work penalty:
Total Score / 180

Interested in a PLAGIARISM-FREE paper based on these particular instructions?...with 100% confidentiality?

Order Now