Interested in a PLAGIARISM-FREE paper based on these particular instructions?...with 100% confidentiality?

Order Now

Describes the methodology of the external articles in an unclear manner and presents the results and implications of the articles

Criteria Absent Poor Needs Improvement Developing Satisfactory Exceptional
Introduction
(10 pts total) Introduction section not included Provides very little information about theory or presents concepts unrelated to topic Provides some contextual background to the theory; Introduces but does not define concepts; Does not present hypothesis for the experiment Provides some contextual and historical background to the theory; Introduces and defines concepts in an unclear manner; Presents the objective and hypothesis for the experiment in an unclear manner Provides adequate historical and contextual background to the theory; Introduces and defines concepts clearly; Presents the objective and hypothesis for the experiment in a manner that shows some understanding of the theory Provides excellent historical and contextual background to the theory; Introduces and defines concepts clearly using examples; Presents the objective and hypothesis for the experiment in a manner that clearly demonstrates understanding of the theory
Method
(10 pts total) Method section not included Presents very little experimental procedure details; Does not present the IV and DV Describes the experimental procedure in confusing terms; Presents, but misidentifies, the IV and DV
Describes the experimental procedure with minimal detail;
Presents, but misidentifies the IV or DV Describes the experimental procedure clearly with minor omissions of detail; Correctly identifies the IV and DV Describes the exact experimental procedure clearly and includes all additional information, such as description of participants; Correctly identifies the IV and DV
Results
(10 pts total) Results section not included Only presents 1 of the 3 data sets or presents the results incorrectly; Does not refer to graphs and/or tables in the text Presents 2 of the 3 data sets or presents the results incorrectly; Does not refer to graphs and/or tables in the text Presents all 3 data sets (individual, group, and global) in a concise manner; Refers to graphs and/or tables incorrectly Presents all 3 data sets (individual, group, and global) in an effective manner; Refers to graphs and/or tables in the Results text
Presents and describes all 3 data sets (individual, group, and global) in a detailed and effective manner; Refers to graphs and/or tables in the Results text
Graphs and/or Tables
(5 pts total) Graphs/tables are not included Graphs and/or tables are included but missing 2 of the 3 data sets (personal, group, or global); Graphs/tables are missing labels and/or not referred to in the text Graphs and/or tables are included but missing 1 of the 3 data sets (personal, group, or global); Graphs/tables are missing labels and/or not referred to in the text Includes graphs and/or tables for personal, group, and global data; Graphs/tables are missing labels and/or not referred to in the text Includes graphs and/or tables for personal, group, and global data; Labels graphs/tables (i.e. Figure 1, Table 2) and refers to them in text Includes graphs and/or tables for personal, group, and global data; Labels graphs/tables (i.e. Figure 1, Table 2) and refers to them in the text in a way that enhances the report

Discussion
(15 pts total) Discussion section not included Includes very little information about the results and how they relate to the hypothesis; Does not include an external article Restates the results but does not include how they relate to the hypothesis; Presents the results of an external article; Does not state relationship between Coglab experiment and external article Refers back to the hypothesis and discusses the results in an unclear manner; Describes the methodology of the external articles in an unclear manner and presents the results and implications of the articles;
States the relationship between Coglab experiment and external articles Refers back to the objective and hypothesis and discusses all 3 sets of results accordingly; Clearly and concisely describes the methodology of the external articles and then presents the results and implications of the articles; States the relationship between Coglab experiment and external articles Refers back to the objective and hypothesis and discusses all 3 sets of results accordingly, stressing the differences between the individual results and that of the 2 groups; Compares the results to the expected findings and discusses similarities and/or differences and possible reasons for any discrepancies; Clearly and concisely describes the methodology of the external articles and then presents the results and implications of the articles; Discusses how each external article builds upon the original Coglab experiment
Conclusion
(5 pts total) Conclusion section not included Does not summarize the research report; Introduces new or unrelated concepts Summarizes the research report in an unclear manner; Introduces new or unrelated concepts Adequately summarizes the research report, addressing each of the required sections, but introduces new concepts Adequately summarizes the research report, clearly addressing each of the required sections; Does not introduce new concepts Effectively summarizes the research report, clearly addressing each of the required sections, and demonstrates clear understanding of the Coglab topic; Does not introduce new concepts
References
(7.5 pts total) References are not provided Provides minimal number of references in report Provides references in report, but some are inappropriate or does not use required references from peer-reviewed journals; Does not refer to Coglab website or textbook Provides references throughout the report; Uses less than 3 references from peer-reviewed journal; Refers to Coglab website and/or textbook in report
Provides adequate and appropriate references throughout the report; Uses 3 references from peer-reviewed journals published within the last 10 years; Refers to Coglab website and/or textbook where appropriate in report Provides excellent references throughout Coglab Report; Presents appropriate reference topics and elaborately describes where necessary; Uses at least 3 references from peer-reviewed journals published within the last 10 years; Refers to Coglab website and/or textbook where appropriate in report
APA format
(7.5 pts total) APA formatting is not included Significant APA formatting errors and/or no Reference page Provides incomplete references and/or citations with significant APA formatting errors in report and/or Reference page Provides mostly complete references with some incorrect APA formatting in report and/or Reference page Provides complete references and mostly correct APA formatting throughout the report as well as in the Reference page Provides complete references and excellent APA formatting throughout the Coglab Report as well as in the Reference page included at the end of paper
Style & Mechanics
(5 pts total) Style and mechanics are not included Writing is hard to follow in general; Provides language that is not engaging or appropriate to topic and audience; Significantly uses first or second person; Has significant grammar, punctuation, and spelling errors Writing is hard to follow at times; Provides language that is not engaging or appropriate to topic and/or audience; Significantly uses first or second person; Has grammar, punctuation, and/or spelling errors Provides language that is engaging and appropriate to topic and audience; Uses third person and past tense most of the time; Has some minor grammar, punctuation, and/or spelling errors Writing is clear, articulate, consistent, and easy to follow; Provides language that is engaging and appropriate to topic and audience; Uses third person and past tense most of the time; Always uses correct grammar, punctuation, and spelling Writing is clear, articulate, consistent, and easy to follow; Provides language that is engaging and appropriate to topic and audience

Interested in a PLAGIARISM-FREE paper based on these particular instructions?...with 100% confidentiality?

Order Now